A Representative Matter
One of Chelsea’s clients was in a divorce that had turned genuinely hostile. Her client’s co-parent was influencing their children against him, to the point where allegations were made that put his career at risk.
From early in the case, Chelsea recommended a full child custody evaluation — a significant expense, and one that would extend the timeline. The client was reluctant at first. About two years in or so, he agreed.
The evaluation, conducted by a neutral court-approved evaluator, supported his position and allegations entirely. The case settled within days of receiving the report, after more than two years of litigation, and the settlement included reimbursement of a substantial portion of the fees he had incurred.
Evaluations are not the right tool in every custody case. But where one parent is severely and significantly manipulating a child's relationship with the other, they are sometimes the only way to make that visible to a court.
Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Details have been generalized to protect client confidentiality.